MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323306801 · doi:10.32920/22223251.v1

Teaching Emerging Technologies as Legal Systems: Proposals for a Changing Law School Curriculum

2023· preprint· en· W4323306801 on OpenAlexaff
Sari Graben

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Law
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumLegal educationCore curriculumEngineering ethicsLegal researchLegal aspects of computingPolitical scienceEmerging technologiesFocus (optics)EngineeringSociologyLawPedagogyEngineering managementComputer scienceThe InternetArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>In this article, I draft the outlines of a law school program that delivers a systemic approach to legal education with a technological focus. I explore the application of systemic learning through three teaching pillars: technology as part of the legal system, user based learning and innovation based learning. By placing these goals at the core of the curriculum, I expand upon the theoretical significance of technology to the construction of law and provide a framework for reorienting some part of legal education towards understanding the technological systems used to ‘produce’ law while teaching practice within it. </p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Intelligence in LawFrench-language works237,207