Explore the IEEE PELS Students and Young Professionals Committee and Get Involved [Students and Young Professionals Rendezvous]
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last years, the number of student and young professional members in IEEE PELS has increased. Students and young professionals now represent over 20% of the membership body and make significant contributions to the dynamism of IEEE PELS. Via the IEEE PELS Students and Young Professionals (S&YP) committee, a subgroup within the PELS membership committee, students and recent graduates in IEEE PELS host a variety of events at IEEE conferences and create activities to engage PELS members while enabling unique networking and mentorship opportunities. With volunteers all across the globe (Algeria, Brazil, Canada, Germany, India, Portugal, Spain, Sri Lanka, and the United States), the S&YP committee also establishes a global and inclusive community for engineers, researchers, academics and students in the area of power electronics. Through its endeavors, the S&YP committee aims to support the professional development of students and recent graduates, further the mission of IEEE PELS and increase the diversity of its membership and volunteering bodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it