MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323312317 · doi:10.7759/cureus.35816

Central Pontine Myelinolysis With Carbamazepine-Induced Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone and Its Management: A Case Report and Literature Review

2023· article· en· W4323312317 on OpenAlexaff
Abia Joseph, Tass Sayeed, Dev K Patel, Sanathan Aiyadurai, Zainab Shahbaz, Sambasiva Rao Mettela, Tulika Garg, Rishika Gadde, Datiobong Udoeyop, Aadil Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectrolyte and hormonal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyponatremiaCarbamazepinePonsCentral pontine myelinolysisSyndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretionAntidiureticPediatricsMagnetic resonance imagingAcetazolamideInternal medicineAnesthesiaHormoneRadiologyPsychiatryEpilepsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aggressive treatment of hyper or hypoosmolar conditions can trigger osmotic demyelination syndrome. We describe the case of a 53-year-old male who began using carbamazepine to treat bipolar affective disorder and was later diagnosed with carbamazepine-induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. The patient's mental state gradually improved once the hyponatremia was corrected using 3% normal saline and supportive therapy. The patient presented to the outpatient clinic with confusion and altered sensorium. Brain computed tomography showed diffuse cerebral atrophy and periventricular ischemia demyelination alterations, and magnetic resonance imaging showed an enhanced section in the brainstem that included the pons, suggesting osmotic demyelination alterations. Ventilatory support and supportive therapy were initiated, and hyponatremia was rectified. Although the patient did well with the treatment, his prognosis was still dismal, so he was sent home with instructions to follow up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicElectrolyte and hormonal disordersFrench-language works237,207