MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323315066 · doi:10.5430/ijba.v14n1p75

Entrepreneurial Intention of Individuals Linked to Companies’ Incubators: A Study Based on Planned Behavior

2023· article· en· W4323315066 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eduardo Heliodoro Arruda, Carolina Barbosa Montenegro, César Ricardo Maia de Vasconcelos

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Business Administration · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLikert scaleIncubatorStructural equation modelingTheory of planned behaviorContext (archaeology)EntrepreneurshipEntrepreneurial orientationMarketingPsychologyConceptual modelDescriptive statisticsScale (ratio)Point (geometry)Test (biology)Knowledge managementBusinessComputer scienceManagementControl (management)StatisticsEconomicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the theory of planned behaviour, the present study aims to understand the entrepreneurial intention of individuals linked to companies’ incubators and to observe the influence of the economic context, the individual entrepreneurial orientation, and the incubator’s actions over their entrepreneurial attitude. This work has a quantitative and descriptive approach, with data collected from a structured questionnaire with a 7-point Likert scale. Structural equation modelling was used to test the hypotheses using the SmartPLS software for data analysis. The practical implications point to using concrete correlation evidence among the constructs to explain the intention and the action of individuals linked to companies’ incubators. Therefore, the statistical results proved that the conceptual model adopted was adequate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Business AdministrationSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207