Attitude Control of the Quadrotor UAV with Mismatched Disturbances Based on the Fractional-Order Sliding Mode and Backstepping Control Subject to Actuator Faults
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considering mismatched disturbances, aerodynamic interference, chattering, and actuator failure in the attitude control of the quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), this paper establishes a new quadrotor UAV model with mismatched disturbances, based on quaternion, and designs a fault tolerant controller. First, in order to reduce the chattering of the traditional reaching law, a new reaching law based on the sigmoid function is introduced into the design. Second, the sliding mode control and backstepping control methods are adopted, based on the new fractional-order sliding mode surface when the faults occur in quadrotor UAV actuators, and parameters in the sliding mode control are adaptively adjusted. The simulation results show that the fault tolerant control method can control the attitude of UAV quickly and achieve good robustness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it