MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323320749 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v25i1.5855

Migrant Workers’ Housing Effects on Their Urban Adaptation: An Empirical Case Study of the Wuling Mountains Area in China

2023· article· en· W4323320749 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiao Sidi, Tian Guang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHuaihua University
KeywordsUrbanizationChinaAdaptation (eye)Migrant workersGovernment (linguistics)Economic growthBusinessEmpirical researchDemographic economicsEconomic geographyGeographyEconomicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is a unique feature of China’s urbanization and a must for migrant workers to integrate into cities. Migrant workers can be integrated into urban life quickly if their housing problem is adequately addressed. However, resolving the housing problem is one of the critical challenges in migrant workers’ urban adaptation. This paper defines an urban transformation from economic, social, psychological, and cultural dimensions and analyzes it from housing facilities, housing performance, supporting facilities, and community environment. Structural equation modeling explores the path between housing and migrant workers’ urban adaptation in the Wuling Mountains area and its impact on their urban adaptation. Then, it proposes suggestions for the government, community, enterprises, and migrant workers from different perspectives to guide the solution to migrant workers’ housing difficulties and facilitate their urban adaptation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207