MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323338358 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3253047

Harmonics Forecasting of Wind and Solar Hybrid Model Driven by DFIG and PMSG Using ANN and ANFIS

2023· article· en· W4323338358 on OpenAlexaff
Fawaz M. Al Hadi, Hamed H. Aly, Timothy Little

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsWind powerTotal harmonic distortionAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemComputer scienceWaveformElectronic engineeringPower electronicsControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringVoltageEngineeringFuzzy logicArtificial intelligenceFuzzy control system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grid integration of Renewable Energy Systems (RES) involves various types of power electronics-based converters and inverters. The use of these electronic-based devices results in inducing both current and voltage harmonics to the grid. In order to reduce harmonics, especially for large-scale integration of RES, harmonic forecasting is one of many techniques used to design harmonic mitigation devices. The core objective of this work is to develop a novel forecasting model for accurate and reliable harmonic estimation for RES. To achieve this two hybrid generator models are used. First model consists of wind turbine coupled with Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) combined with Solar Photo Voltaic (PV) based power generator which are connected to common grid. The second model uses Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator (PMSG) with wind turbine in conjunction with Solar-PV generator. With real world meteorological data (wind speed and solar irradiation) as inputs, these generators simulate and produce output power with current and voltage waveforms. Harmonics are extracted from these waveforms to record, analyze, arrange and forecast future harmonics. Three parameters namely, Total Harmonics Distortion (THD) and the dominant individual harmonic contents, 11 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> harmonic (h11) and 13 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> harmonic (h13) are forecasted for both voltage and current waveforms. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) are the prominent methods used for forecasting. Three types of three-layered ANN structures namely Cascaded Neural Network with Recurrent Local feedback (3LCRNNL), Cascaded Neural Network with Recurrent Global feedback (3LCRNNG) and Cascaded Neural Network with Local and Global feedback (CRNNGL) have been proposed and utilized in this work with hyperbolic tangent as transfer function to adjust weights and scaled conjugate gradient method as optimizer to reduce training error. ANFIS is also employed with subtractive clustering method to improve adaptability and accuracy of forecasts. The results are compared and presented which shows that ANFIS recorded the best performance for THDV and h13 and 3LCRNNGL for h11 for the Wind DFIG-PV model voltage harmonics forecast. For forecasts of the current harmonics, 3LCRNNGL performed best for THDI and h11, whereas ANFIS performed best for h13. For Wind PMSG-PV generator model, ANFIS yields the best results in every scenario involving voltage and current harmonics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207