MICAL: Mutual Information-Based CNN-Aided Learned Factor Graphs for Seizure Detection From EEG Signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We develop a hybrid model-based data-driven seizure detection algorithm called Mutual Information-based CNN-Aided Learned factor graphs (MICAL) for detection of eclectic seizures from EEG signals. Our proposed method contains three main components: a neural mutual information (MI) estimator, 1D convolutional neural network (CNN), and factor graph inference. Since during seizure the electrical activity in one or more regions in the brain becomes correlated, we use neural MI estimators to measure inter-channel statistical dependence. We also design a 1D CNN to extract additional features from raw EEG signals. Since the soft estimates obtained as the combined features from the neural MI estimator and the CNN do not capture the temporal correlation between different EEG blocks, we use them not as estimates of the seizure state, but to compute the function nodes of a factor graph. The resulting factor graphs allows structured inference which exploits the temporal correlation for further improving the detection performance. On public CHB-MIT database, We conduct three evaluation approaches using the public CHB-MIT database, including 6-fold leave-four-patients-out cross-validation, all patient training; and per patient training. Our evaluations systematically demonstrate the impact of each element in MICAL through a complete ablation study and measuring six performance metrics. It is shown that the proposed method obtains state-of-the-art performance specifically in 6-fold leave-four-patients-out cross-validation and all patient training, demonstrating a superior generalizability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".