SNR Threshold-Based Relay Association and Random Phase Rotation for Cooperative Communication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a cooperative communication system that employs multiple decode-and-forward relay nodes (RNs), in which the associated/active RNs perform phase rotation of the regenerated signals before retransmitting them to a destination node (DN), is examined. In the first phase, i.e., communication from a source node to RNs, a received signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) threshold-based RN association method is proposed. The optimal SNR thresholds are designed to maximize the bit-error-rate (BER) performance at the DN under various communication environments, such as modulation types and channel code rates. Furthermore, the number of phase rotations (PRs) in a frame is examined. Intensive numerical results show that more PRs in a frame provide better BER performance at the DN, irrespective of the communication environments. This study provides a valuable guideline for designing practical cooperative networks with multiple decode-and-forward RNs with PRs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".