MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323338647 · doi:10.1109/tie.2023.3250765

Multirate Modeling and Predictive Control for WBG-Device-Based High-Switching-Frequency Power Converters

2023· article· en· W4323338647 on OpenAlexafffund
Cheng Xue, Li Ding, Zhongyi Quan, Yunwei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInterruptInterrupt handlerComputer scienceConvertersModel predictive controlElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)InverterPower (physics)EngineeringEmbedded systemControl (management)VoltageElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the growth of wide-bandgap devices, it is necessary to exploit the high-switching-frequency benefits to improve the performance of power converter, thus requiring a higher sampling/interrupt frequency in digital signal processors. However, such a short interrupt time duration imposes big computational difficulty in the execution of programming code, especially using the model-predictive control (MPC). Thus, most of the existing MPCs are applied with switching frequencies below 20 kHz, which cannot exploit the full potential of the wide-bandgap-device-based power converters. To solve this challenge, this article proposes a multirate MPC scheme, where the trigger of interrupt and switching device transition can be performed at different rates. Compared with conventional MPCs, the main uniqueness of the proposed multirate MPC is that the high-dimensional control sequence is solved and applied within each interrupt interval. Therefore, the increased switching frequency objective can be easily achieved with a low sampling/interrupt frequency configuration, which also significantly relieves the digital execution of the heavy interrupt tasks. The proposed method shows a more optimized control input and higher computational efficiency over the multirate finite-control-set MPC counterpart. A silicon-carbide-inverter-fed ac motor drive system is used to verify the proposed multirate MPC. The results show the improved system performance with the combined advantages of both the high switching frequency and the MPC strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207