L’Acte de Québec de 1774 : relique du passé ou charte contemporaine ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’identification des composantes de la Constitution du Canada est un exercice controversé. C’est dans ce contexte que les tribunaux se sont récemment penchés sur l’existence et le statut contemporains de l’ Acte de Québec de 1774 . L’auteur aborde cette question afin de mieux circonscrire la place de cet acte dans le paysage juridique et constitutionnel d’aujourd’hui. Il conclut, dans un premier temps, que plusieurs de ses dispositions demeurent en vigueur. Dans un deuxième temps, il soutient que certains de ces articles, relatifs au libre exercice de la religion et à la liberté testamentaire, font partie de la Constitution du Canada et l’emportent sur les lois ordinaires qui leur sont contraires. Loin de n’être qu’une relique du passé, l’Acte de Québec joue donc le rôle d’une charte contemporaine qui conserve toute sa pertinence en ces deux matières.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".