An integrated optimization for minimizing the operation cost of home delivery services in O2O retail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the spread of the epidemic, the home delivery service (HDS) has been quickly introduced by retailers which helps customers avoid the risk of viral infection while shopping at offline stores. However, the operation cost of HDS is a huge investment for O2O retailers. How to minimize the operating costs of HDS is an urgent issue for the industry. To solve this problem, we outline those management decisions of HDS that have an impact on operating costs, including dynamic vehicle routing, driver sizing and scheduling, and propose an integrated optimization model by comprehensively considering these management decisions. Moreover, the dynamic feature of online orders and the heterogeneous workforces are also considered in this model. To solve this model, an efficient adaptive large neighborhood search (ALNS) and branch-and-cut algorithms are developed. In the case study, we collected real data from a leading O2O retailer in China to assess the effectiveness of our proposed model and algorithms. Experimental results show that our approach can effectively reduce the operating costs of HDS. Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis is conducted to reveal the changing patterns in operating costs, and some valuable management insights are provided for O2O retailers. The theoretical and numerical results would shed light on the management of HDS for O2O retailers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".