Periodic blood inventory system with two supplies and two priority demand classes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Managing blood inventory is challenging due to the perishable and unstable nature of the product needed for transfusions in healthcare facilities. In this paper, we consider a periodic review blood inventory model with two priority demand classes, namely emergency and regular patients. We propose a dynamic programming model for determining the optimal ordering policy at the hospital given the uncertainty regarding received donated blood units. The optimal policy deals with placing orders for blood units that will expire within a fixed period. The objective is to minimize total expected costs within a planning horizon while maintaining a specified expected service level. Our model considers uncertain demands and donated blood units with discrete probability following known distributions. A tabu search algorithm is developed for large-scale problems. The performance of these ordering policies is compared against the optimal fixed order quantity and the order up-to-level policies using real-life data. The numerical results show the benefit of our model over the optimal fixed order quantity and the order up-to-level policies. We measure the total expected cost and the expected service level obtained from the optimal and near-optimal policies and provide a sensitivity analysis on parameters of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".