Hybrid algorithm proposal for optimizing benchmarking problems: Salp swarm algorithm enhanced by arithmetic optimization algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metaheuristic algorithms are easy, flexible and nature-inspired algorithms used to optimize functions. To make metaheuristic algorithms better, multiple algorithms are combined and hybridized. In this context, a hybrid algorithm (HSSAOA) was developed by adapting the exploration phase of the arithmetic optimization algorithm (AOA) to the position update part of the salp swarm algorithm (SSA) of the leader salps/salps. And also, there have also been a few new additions to the SSA. The proposed HSSAOA was tested in three different groups using 22 benchmark functions and compared with 7 well-known algorithms. HSSAOA optimized the best results in a total of 16 benchmark functions in each group. In addition, a statistically significant difference was obtained compared to other algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it