Heuristics and metaheuristics to minimize makespan for flowshop with peak power consumption constraints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with peak power consumption constraints (PFSPP). The real-time power consumption of the PFSPP cannot exceed a given peak power at any time. First, a mathematical model is established to describe the concerned problem. The sequence of operations is taken as a solution and the characteristics of solutions are analyzed. Based on the problem characteristics, eight heuristics are proposed, including balanced machine-job decoding method, balanced machine-job insert method, balanced job-machine insert method, balanced machine-job group insert method, balanced job-machine group insert method, greedy algorithm, beam search algorithm, and improved beam search algorithm. Similarly, the canonical artificial bee colony algorithm and iterated local search algorithm are modified based on the problem characteristics to solve the PFSPP. A large number of experiments are carried out to evaluate the performance of new proposed heuristics and metaheuristics. The results and discussion show that the proposed heuristics and metaheuristics perform well in solving the PFSPP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it