MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323343847 · doi:10.33423/jlae.v19i4.5759

Connecting School Leaders in an Ethic of Care Community

2022· article· en· W4323343847 on OpenAlexaff
Christy Thomas, Sherry Martens

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Leadership Accountability and Ethics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsAmbrose University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeContext (archaeology)PsychologyPublic relationsSociologyPedagogySocial psychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of school administrators continues to expand and intensify leading to decreased dissatisfaction and reported moral distress. There is a need to explore professional learning opportunities for school leaders that allow for trusting, open conversations that build an ‘ethic of care’ (Noddings, 1982). Utilizing narrative inquiry, participant’s stories on their experiences navigating moral distress and the impact of being part of an online ‘ethic of care’ community was analyzed. This study informs those seeking to develop an ‘ethic of care’ community focused on personal leadership development to support school leaders to flourish within a rising context of moral distress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.353
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.102 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Leadership Accountability and EthicsSame topicEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207