A252 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS: KINGSTON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER LOCAL EXPERIENCE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background IBD-PSC remains a poorly understood entity due to it’s low incidence and the heterogeneity found within this patient population. Patients with IBD-PSC have 0.3-2.8% lifetime risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma, up to a 20% lifetime risk of developing Cholangiocarcinoma and a 20-30% lifetime risk of developing Colorectal Cancer (Fung et al. World J Gastroenterol 2019). To better understand long-term outcomes in this population, the use of large population level data can be useful but requires case validation. Purpose A large multicenter Canadian retrospective cohort study is ongoing with the goals of identifying an algorithm to identify IBD-PSC patients and compare long-term outcomes of IBD-PSC patients with a matched IBD cohort (Ricciuto et al, ongoing). This abstract describes the local data within Kingston Health Sciences Centre (KHSC) from this Canadian multi-center study and evaluates the use of ICD codes for the identification of IBD-PSC. Method This is a single centre retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD-PSC within KHSC from January 1993 - December 2021. Patients with potential IBD-PSC were initially identified locally using ICD codes for IBD and cholangitis. Charts were reviewed and IBD-PSC diagnosis was confirmed using pathology from liver biopsies and imaging. Those confirmed to have IBD-PSC then had data manually extracted from the local health administrative system. Outcomes of interest were divided into patient demographics, disease phenotype at diagnosis of IBD-PSC and therapies. Patients were followed until death, leaving the KHSC network or the end of the follow-up period. Result(s) Of the 862 patients identified using ICD codes, 16 (2%) were confirmed to have IBD-PSC after chart review. 50% of included patients had other autoimmune diseases. The median age of diagnosis of PSC was 34 years (IQR=22-43) while the median age of diagnosis of IBD was 22 (IQR=15-38). Large duct PSC was found in 88% of patients. Six patients had disease that was exclusively intra-hepatic. Two patients were found to have PSC with auto-immune hepatitis overlap. Mean ALP at diagnosis was 402 (IQR=208-506). Four patients developed cirrhosis, two of which experienced hepatic decompensation. Three patients underwent liver transplant. 81% of patients had ulcerative colitis. At the index lower endoscopy, 33% of patients had Mayo 3 colitis and 75% had involvement of the right colon. During follow up in our study, 81% of patients required systemic steroids and 33% required biologic therapy. Conclusion(s) ICD codes alone cannot reliably identify patients with IBD-PSC. The characteristics of the patients in our local experience are in keeping with existing literature. Completion of this multi-center study will allow for a greater sample size, a matched control group and a better understanding of the long-term impacts of this disease. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".