MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323351141 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.014

A14 TRANSABDOMINAL BOWEL ULTRASOUND AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES OVER ONE YEAR IN CHILDREN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED CROHN’S DISEASE

2023· article· en· W4323351141 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexandra Hudson, Daniela Migliarese Isaac, K Novak, H Ma, A Kuc, M. Carroll, Eytan Wine, H Huynh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineRectumGastroenterologyCalprotectinColonoscopyEndoscopyDiseaseProspective cohort studyFaecal calprotectinUlcerative colitisColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Transabdominal bowel ultrasound (TABUS) is an emerging non-invasive tool for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Its use is particularly increasing in pediatric IBD, given the need for anesthesia during endoscopy. The assessment of TABUS in pediatric IBD has been limited to small numbers of patients with no long-term follow-up. Purpose To describe TABUS findings and its relationship with clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic assessments in pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease up to one year post-diagnosis. Method Patients (0-18 years) with suspected IBD were prospectively enrolled through the Edmonton Pediatric IBD Clinic. Those with Crohn’s disease were included. Patients underwent repeated TABUS, clinical assessments, blood work, fecal calprotectin (FCP) (baseline, 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-months), and endoscopy (baseline and 6-12 months). The weighted Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (wPCDAI), Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease (SES-CD; rectum excluded), and Simple Ultrasound Activity Score for Crohn’s Disease (SUS-CD; rectum excluded) were used. Remission was defined as FCP<250mg/kg, CRP<4mg/L, wPCDAI<12, no upcoming surgery, and SES-CD score ≤2 for any bowel segment. Result(s) Fifty-six patients (68% male), median age 12.5 years (range 6-17), were followed for 6 months. Forty (71%) were followed up to 12 months. Median TABUS bowel wall thickness (BWT) and SUS-CD total scores improved in all bowel segments over time. SUS-CD total scores significantly correlated with SES-CD (baseline, 6-, 12-months), wPCDAI (baseline, 1-, 6-, 12-months), CRP (baseline, 1-, 3-, 6-months), ESR (baseline, 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-months), and FCP (baseline, 1-, 6-, 12-months) (rho ranged 0.302-0.732, p<0.05). Patients in remission had sustained significantly thinner BWT of their most affected bowel segment (Figure 1) starting at 1-month (median 3.1mm (IQR 2.7-3.7) vs. 4.1mm (IQR 2.9-5.6; p<0.05), and sustained significantly lower SUS-CD total scores starting at 6 months (median 0 (IQR 0-1) vs. median 2 (IQR 1-3); p<0.05). Seven patients had surgery (n=7/7 ileocecal, n=2/7 jejunal resection). All 7 patients had complex TI disease (n=6 strictures, n=1 long-segment disease >25cm) and proximal small bowel disease (n=2/2) on TABUS. Those with baseline ultrasound findings of a stricture with upstream bowel dilatation (n=7/56) had increased odds (OR=288, p<0.01) and relative risk (RR=42, p<0.01) of needing surgery (n=6/7 with baseline obstructive findings, n=1/49 without) within the first year. Image Conclusion(s) TABUS had significant correlations with clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic markers of Crohn’s disease activity in pediatric patients over one year. Bowel wall thickness of the most affected bowel segment is a helpful measurement, becoming significantly thinner as soon as 1-month post-diagnosis in those who obtain remission. Baseline findings of bowel narrowing and upstream dilation increase the odds and relative risk of needing surgery in the first year. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal MalignanciesFrench-language works237,207