MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323351240 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.038

A38 INVESTIGATION OF POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATIONS IN SERUM OF CROHN’S DISEASE PATIENTS USING A PROTEOMICS APPROACH

2023· article· en· W4323351240 on OpenAlexaffabout
L G N De Almeida, R Rosentreter, Simon A. Hirota, Chengjin Lu, A Dufour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteomicsContext (archaeology)Posttranslational modificationDiseasePhenotypeCysteineComputational biologyBioinformaticsMedicineBiologyBiochemistryInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Canada has one of the highest prevalences of Crohn’s disease (CD) worldwide. More specifically, fibrostenotic CD is a phenotype with prolonged chronic inflammation and fibrotic strictures often resistant to anti-inflammatory therapies and characterized by luminal narrowing that ultimately requires surgery. Proteins play an essential role in disease pathogenesis, and post-translational modifications (PTMs) can alter their properties. PTMs have been frequently implicated in human diseases. However, they have yet to be explored in the context of CD, which could lead to new avenues for a better understanding of disease mechanisms and the discovery of biomarkers. Purpose Identify post-translational modifications in serum proteins of CD patients. Method Serum samples from patients with strictures or inflammatory phenotype (without strictures) (n=4 per group), as diagnosed by intestinal ultrasound, were analyzed using a shotgun-proteomics approach. Protein identification and PTM prediction were performed with FragPipe. Identified mass shifts determined by an open search in FragPipe were mapped to possible PTMs and confirmed via unimod.org. Statistical significance analysis was performed with MSstatsPTM. Result(s) The prediction analysis identified 363 potential modification sites, including artifacts and chemical derivatives. The addition of all potential PTMs in the analysis would lead to false positives; therefore, it was selected five of the most abundant mass shifts mapped to true PTMs: cysteine oxidation, serine methylation, and three modifications of the protein n-termini (formaldehyde adduct, carbamylation, and formylation). Standard proteomics analysis identified 3635 unique peptides and 317 unique proteins. The addition of the predicted PTMs increased the number of peptides by 9.8%, reaching 3994 unique sequences. Interestingly, a very subtle increase was observed on the protein level, where only two additional proteins were identified. Of the PTMs identified, methylation of a serine residue on the variable chain of immunoglobulin (IGLV1-47) was statistically enriched in inflammatory samples (5.74 fold change, adj. p-value = 0.041). The variable chain participates in the antigen recognition process, and modification of its amino acids could impact antibody specificity. Additionally, structuring patients showed two modifications on thrombin: oxidation of cysteine and methylation of serine. Thrombin was previously shown to be elevated in CD patients compared to healthy controls. As both modifications were not present in inflammatory patients, they constitute potential biomarkers for specific diagnosis of the structuring disease. Conclusion(s) The observed gain in peptide identification demonstrates the diversification promoted by PTMs and exhibits their importance in proteomics studies. Even though the identified modifications require further validation, they can shed light on new players of CD pathogenesis and suggest novel biomarkers for disease diagnosis. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→