MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323351342 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.168

A168 COSTS OF MISSED WORK AMONG PEOPLE WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL POPULATION-REPRESENTATIVE STUDY

2023· article· en· W4323351342 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaUniversity of CalgarySickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMarital statusInflammatory bowel diseasePopulationAbsenteeismPoisson regressionCross-sectional studyDemographyHealth careDiseaseEnvironmental healthInternal medicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The relapsing and remitting symptoms experienced by people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including abdominal pain and diarrhea, may impact their employability and workplace productivity. Purpose Report the impact of IBD on missed work and its associated costs using population-representative data with the goal of understanding the population-level indirect costs of IBD in Canada. Method We used the 2010 and 2014 waves of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) to compare missed work and its associated costs among survey respondents aged 20 to 64 years with physician-diagnosed IBD compared to those without IBD. Students and those with non-IBD bowel disorders were excluded. The cost of missed work was derived from reported annual income and the number of workdays missed. Survey weights were used for descriptive statistics. Poisson regression modified for binary outcomes was used to compare employment within the past 3 months among those with and without IBD. Heckman models (two-stage models accounting for the likelihood of being employed) were used to compare the number of days missed and the cost of missed work in the two groups. Models were adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, immigration status, visible minority status, number of non-IBD chronic conditions, and mood or anxiety disorder. All costs were inflation-adjusted to 2022 Canadian dollars. Result(s) Among 67,907 eligible respondents, 810 (weighted 1.0%) had IBD. Employment in the last 3 months was reported among 70% of people with IBD compared to 80% of people without IBD (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96). Among those employed in the prior 3 months, employed people with IBD missed an average of 1.6 (SD 4.4) days of work compared to 1.0 (SD 3.5) days missed among those without IBD, corresponding to $415 (SD 1315) in lost wages among those with IBD and $235 (SD 932) among those without IBD. Accounting for the higher rates of unemployment in those with IBD using Heckman models, people with IBD missed an additional 1.1 days (95% CI 0.7 to 1.5) of work and lost an additional $270 (95% CI 163 to 377) in income over 3 months. Extrapolating to the estimated 184,460 employed Canadians with IBD, the attributable indirect cost of missed work due to IBD is nearly $200 million annually. Conclusion(s) The economic burden of IBD resulting from missed work is substantial. Since IBD is often diagnosed during adolescence and early adulthood, employability and productivity are important long-term patient-centered outcomes. Novel interventions that could mitigate these attendant effects of IBD are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it