MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323351947 · doi:10.1097/mat.0000000000001909

Pitfalls and Possibilities of Ventricular Assist Device Support in Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries in Children

2023· article· en· W4323351947 on OpenAlex
Alyssa Belfiore, Andrea Maurich, Osami Honjo, Mjaye Mazwi, Emilie Jean‐St‐Michel, Mimi Deng, Áine Lynch, Oshri Zaulan, Aamir Jeewa

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASAIO Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreat arteriesMedicineVentricleHeart diseaseHeart failureTransposition (logic)CardiologyVentricular assist deviceInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGAs) represents a complex form of congenital heart disease that is associated with several cardiac complications. Herein is a case series of three children with ccTGA and ventricular assist device (VAD) inserted for systemic right ventricle failure at a single institution. All patients remained hemodynamically stable postimplant and were successfully discharged from the intensive care unit to undergo postoperative rehabilitation. All three patients received an orthotopic heart transplant with uneventful posttransplant courses. This case series provides insight into the medical management and technical feasibility of VAD support in children with ccTGA with end-stage heart failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it