A232 RISK OF TOTAL METACHRONOUS ADVANCED NEOPLASIA AT SURVEILLANCE COLONOSCOPY AFTER DETECTION OF SERRATED LESIONS: A MATCHED COHORT STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Serrated lesions (SLs), including sessile serrated lesions (SSL) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) have become subject of increased interest for their role as CRC precursors. Purpose Study aim was to evaluate the risk to develop total metachronous advanced neoplasia (T-MAN) at follow-up in patients with index SL compared to a matched cohort without SL. Method Patients 45-74y with SLs were identified through pathology database search. SL patients were matched 2:1 by sex; age; synchronous polyps (high-risk adenoma [HRA], low-risk adenoma [LRA], no-adenoma); timing of index, to patients without SL. Primary outcome was risk of T-MAN (advanced adenoma or high-risk SL) at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included risk of T-MAN stratified by synchronous polyps and SL characteristics. Result(s) 1425 patients were included (475 patients, 642 SLs; 950 controls (mean follow-up 2.9 vs 3.9y). The SL group had greater risk of T-MAN compared to the non-SL group [Hazard-ratio (HR)=6.12 (95%confidence-interval (CI)3.91-9.58)]. Patients with SL+HRA had higher risk of T-MAN compared to HRA alone [HR=2.62 (95%CI 1.45-4.71)], as well as patients with SL+LRA compared to LRA alone [HR=7.03 (95%CI 2.78-18.44)], and SL without adenoma compared to no-adenoma [HR=14.87 (95%CI 6.51-33.95)]. Presence of proximal SSL (HR=9.30), large SSL (HR=17.87) and proximal large SSL (HR=24.99), but not distal SSL, was associated with greater risk for T-MAN. Conclusion(s) Patients with SLs are at greater risk for developing T-MAN regardless of synchronous adenomas. Patients with SL and HRA, and those with large or proximal SSLs appear to be at greatest risk for T-MAN. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below Other Please indicate your source of funding; ACG Disclosure of Interest R. Djinbachian Grant / Research support from: Grant from the American College of Gastroenterology for the conduction of this project, M.-L. Lafontaine: None Declared, J. Anderson: None Declared, H. Pohl: None Declared, T. Dufault: None Declared, M. Boivin: None Declared, M. Bouin: None Declared, D. von Renteln Grant / Research support from: Daniel von Renteln is supported by a “Fonds de Recherche du Québec Santé” (FRQS) career development award and has received research funding from ERBE, Ventage, Pendopharm, Fujifilm, and Pentax., Consultant of: Boston Scientific and Pendopharm,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".