MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323354534 · doi:10.5194/essd-2022-361-rc2

Reply on AC1

2023· peer-review· en· W4323354534 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Eric Wolff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilNational Institute of Polar ResearchBergens ForskningsstiftelseHáskóli ÍslandsUniversitetet i BergenComisión de Investigaciones CientíficasEuropean Science FoundationCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueKorea Polar Research InstituteAgence Nationale de la RechercheNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekInstitut Polaire Français Paul Emile VictorNatural Resources CanadaFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekOffice of Polar ProgramsFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIce coreSeries (stratigraphy)GeologyRange (aeronautics)Greenland ice sheetScale (ratio)ClimatologyIce sheetMeteorologyGeographyPhysical geographyCartographyPaleontologyOceanographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. We here describe, document, and make available a wide range of data sets used for annual layer identification in ice cores from DYE-3, GRIP, NGRIP, NEEM, and EGRIP. The data stem from detailed measurements performed both on the main deep cores and shallow cores over more than forty years using many different setups developed by research groups in several countries, and comprise both discrete measurements from cut ice samples and continuous-flow analysis data. The data series were used for the construction of the Greenland Ice-Core Chronology 2005 (GICC05) and/or the revised GICC21. Now that the underlying data are made available, we also release the individual annual layer positions of the GICC05 time scale which are based on these data sets. We hope that the release of the data sets will stimulate further studies of the past climate taking advantage of these highly resolved data series covering a large part of the interior of the Greenland ice sheet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0180.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1930.149

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→