MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323355142 · doi:10.51249/gei.v4i01.1214

NEOLIBERALISM

2023· article· en· W4323355142 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations and Autism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)PopulismInefficiencyPoliticsPolitical economyPolitical scienceAmbiguitySociologyEconomicsMarket economyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Populism is present in the current political scenario in a modern way associated with neoliberalism. The objective of this work is to associate the subjective impacts produced by neoliberal policies on the individual, mainly the feeling of competition and the vision of work as a source of profit and, no longer of exchange, with the rise of right-wing populism in the last decade as a response to the crises of the capitalist system itself, largely due to the inefficiency of the political left in offering strong answers. The methodology chosen is based on the critical association of texts by Foucault, Dardor, Laval and Ruzza, in which a dialogue between subjective aspects of the individual and the macro structure of current politics will be promoted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it