MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323359377 · doi:10.1049/cmu2.12597

Design of 60 GHz millimeter‐wave SIW antenna for 5G WLAN/WPAN applications

2023· article· en· W4323359377 on OpenAlex
Khaled A. M. Al Soufy, Nagi H. Al‐Ashwal, Mohamed A. Swillam, F. S. Al-kamali, Claude D’Amours, Essa M. Marish, Ali N. Alnajjar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReturn lossComputer scienceElectrical engineeringAntenna gainAntenna efficiencyTelecommunicationsAntenna (radio)Radiation patternElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Broadband millimeter Wave (mmWave) transmission at the 60 GHz band is a great prospect to meet the demanding high data rate requirements of future wireless personal area network (WPAN) and wireless local area network (WLAN) 5G networks. This paper proposes a single layer H‐plane sectoral horn mmWave antenna at 60 GHz using substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) technology for the future high‐speed short range WPAN and WLAN networks. The benefits of the proposed antenna are high gain, low cost, small size, and ease of integration with other planar circuits. The proposed SIW horn is constructed with RT/duroid 5880 substrate, which has a relative permittivity and loss tangent with a thickness of 0.508 mm. The novelty of this work is; a wider bandwidth is achieved by adding striplines at the horn aperture to match the antenna with air and to increase the antenna operating bandwidth. In addition, the antenna gain is improved by adding a dielectric lens with the striplines at the radiating end. During these steps, the antenna parameters are tuned and optimized to achieve the best results as compared to related previous studies. The proposed antenna's performance is analyzed in terms of gain, return loss (S11) and radiation pattern at a frequency of 60 GHz. Simulation results are carried out by using industry standard software, Computer Simulation Technology (CST) microwave studio. The designed antenna achieves a peak gain of 13 dB and impedance bandwidth when , 8.6 GHz (13.688%) for the reflection coefficient of . The results show that the proposed antenna achieves stable tunable 60 GHz frequency performance, which makes it feasible to deploy in WLAN/WPAN operating in mmWave bands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it