Thung Luang Rangsit Pathum Thani Province's Cultural Heritage Map of the 100th Anniversary Temple, Thailand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To survey and map Thung Luang Rangsit's cultural heritage was one of the study's primary goals.The research team's goal is to examine, gather, and evaluate data on the possibilities of cultural heritage tourism.Using data, information, and pertinent documents, as well as observations, surveys, and group discussions with community members and representatives from relevant organizations.The research results revealed the cultural heritage map of Thung Luang Rangsit, Pathum Thani Province.There are outstanding tourist attractions in art, products, food, and architecture.The potential of such tourism resources is in line with preserving the city and the historic district.It has a connection with history, reflects culture and beliefs, and reflects the people's way of life in the area.However, the concept of tourism news development standards still needs public relations.To construct a trail or tourism programs that connect tourism to other old town attractions, studies of ancient architecture, adhering to the idea of conserving the city and neighborhood history, and building a brand (branding) of Pathum Thani are suggested further research topics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".