Twenty-first-century feminismos: women's movements in Latin America and the Caribbean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Simone Bohn and Charmain Levy's Twenty-first-century feminismos offers a thorough exploration of recent women's and feminist movements in eight countries across Latin America and the Caribbean. Divided into ten chapters, the volume traces the local, national and transnational histories, as well as the socio-political dynamics of feminist mobilizing. Its varied, in-depth case-studies provide an overview of the contemporary movements in light of the historical developments of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. This interdisciplinary book makes important contributions to various fields, including gender studies, Latin American studies and political science. Despite its breadth and diversity, there are recurring themes that emerge throughout the chapters. These fall into three broad categories: struggles for autonomy (be it reproductive, Indigenous or anti-imperialist); alliances and tensions between institutional and autonomous approaches to social change; and the production of knowledge grounded in the lived experiences of the movements. This last point is further reflected in the composition of the volume, as more than half of the chapters are translated from French, Spanish or Portuguese. Hence, the contributors provide insights into new sites of analysis and theorizing within anglophone literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".