MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323363471 · doi:10.47391/jpma.7558

Semaglutide: new dawn for diabetics

2023· letter· en· W4323363471 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Areeba Memon, Moniba Tehrim, Beena Kumari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Pakistan Medical Association · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemaglutideMedicineDulaglutideSitagliptinType 2 diabetesWeight lossDiabetes mellitusMetforminInternal medicineBlood pressureInsulinPharmacologyLiraglutideEndocrinologyObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Madam, the growing prevalence of diabetes and obesity in Pakistan demands an optimal treatment plan to simultaneously manage the root pathologies. Semaglutide is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and has recently, in 2020, approved for cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction in adults with T2D and known heart disease. Semaglutide has proved beneficial in terms of inducing weight loss while actively reducing blood glucose and blood pressure. It is also the first of its class to be available in an oral form in addition to the standard subcutaneous (SC) therapy. Results from various research trials indicate a superiority of Semaglutide not only among other GLP-1 RA of its class but also over insulin glargine and Sitagliptin inducing significant weight loss and reducing HbA1c and systolic blood pressure.1 It does this while continuing to offer a favorable CV profile. Studies like Sustain 6 and Pioneer 6, have demonstrated a non-inferiority and safety of SC and oral Semaglutide in CV health. At the same time while we await the completion of the SOUL and SELECT trials to confirm an added potential superiority in improving CV outcomes.2 In conclusion, Semaglutide can safely be used in patients with T2D as a monotherapy or as an add-on to metformin or insulin. The Diabetes Canada guidelines 2018 recommend using incretins like GLP1 RA, and/or Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) when weight loss and lower risk of hypoglycemia are a targeted patient priority.3 However, Helena et al. have demonstrated more significant reductions in HbA1c and continued weight loss beyond week 26 up to week 52, with Semaglutide signifying its superiority over standard empagliflozin therapy.4 Semaglutide, although well-tolerated, has some side effects, including dizziness, headache, and gastrointestinal upset3,5 that can be reduced by gradually increasing the dose.3 Potential side effects of pancreatitis and diabetic retinopathy, however, require physicians to warrant caution as such side effects may yet have been underreported or understudied.1 Nonetheless, the beneficial effects of Semaglutide, a once-weekly SC dose, and the alternative option of an oral formulation offer ease of use for the patient. However, the lack of research and cost-effectiveness have limited its use and availability in Pakistan. Therefore, ample work must be done to introduce this important drug in our market and routine practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Pakistan Medical AssociationSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207