MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323364886 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.180125

Analysis of Rainfall, Wind Speed and Streamflow Trends and Their Relationships in the Klip River Catchment, Alfred Duma Municipality, South Africa

2023· article· en· W4323364886 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dunisani T. Chabalala, Julius Musyoka Ndambuki, Sophia Sudi Rwanga

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of South AfricaTshwane University of Technology
KeywordsStreamflowHydrology (agriculture)Drainage basinGeographyWind speedEnvironmental scienceClimatologyRiver managementMeteorologyGeologyCartographyEnvironmental resource managementGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ladysmith, a town in South Africa's KwaZulu-Natal province, has experienced flooding almost every year since 1884, resulting in temporary water shortages as well as the loss of lives, properties, and businesses.Ladysmith is a major economic, financial, and administrative hub for both the Alfred Duma municipality and the uThukela District Municipality.This study aimed to study the relationships between rainfall, wind speed, and streamflow trends in the Klip River catchment.The monthly, seasonal and annual trends were studied using the Mann-Kendall test.The study's findings revealed both decreasing and increasing trends in all streamflow, wind speed and rainfall.Streamflow and wind speed increased in most months, while rainfall had an equal combination of both increasing and decreasing trends throughout the year.The average annual streamflow decreased at a rate of -1.39 m 3 /s, rainfall at -3.05 mm, whereas wind speed increased by 3.68 m/s.On a seasonal scale, streamflow showed a decrease in spring and summer, whereas rainfall increased in the same seasons.In contrast, wind speed showed an increasing trend in all seasons.These results could be helpful in the planning and development of sustainable flood mitigation strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207