Epidemiological Analysis of Symmetry in Transmission of the Ebola Virus with Power Law Kernel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a mathematical model of non-integer order through the fractal fractional Caputo operator to determine the development of Ebola virus infections. To construct the model and conduct analysis, all Ebola virus cases are taken as incidence data. A symmetric approach is utilized for qualitative and quantitative analysis of the fractional order model. Additionally, stability is evaluated, along with the local and global effects of the virus that causes Ebola. Using the fractional order model of Ebola virus infections, the existence and uniqueness of solutions, as well the posedness and biological viability and disease free equilibrium points are confirmed. Many applications of fractional operators in modern mathematics exist, including the intricate and important study of symmetrical systems. Symmetry analysis is a powerful tool that enables the creation of numerical solutions for a given fractional differential equation very methodically. For this, we compare the results with the Caputo derivative operator to understand the dynamic behavior of the disease. The simulation demonstrates how all classes have convergent characteristics and maintain their places over time, reflecting the true behavior of Ebola virus infection. Power law kernel with the two step polynomial Newton method were used. This model seems to be quite strong and capable of reproducing the issue’s anticipated theoretical conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".