MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323438856 · doi:10.17615/9xzh-tw44

The Majorana Demonstrator Status and Preliminary Results

2023· article· en· W4323438856 on OpenAlexfundno aff
K. Rielage, T.S. Caldwell, A.M. Lopez, Y.-D. Chan, C. Wiseman, R. Massarczyk, I. J. Arnquist, C. Dunagan, M. Green, G. Othman, S. Mertens, F.E. Bertrand, L. Hehn, T. Bode, C.R. Haufe, E. Yakushev, V. Brudanin, S. Vasilyev, R.D. Martin, I.S. Guinn, R.L. Varner, Y. Efremenko, D.C. Radford, F.T. Avignone, A.S. Barabash, C.J. Barton, I. Zhitnikov, K. Vorren, W. Xu, S.J. Meijer, V. Yumatov, N.W. Ruof, K.J. Keeter, D. Tedeschi, J. Gruszko, C.-H. Yu, S.I. Alvis, W. Pettus, B. Shanks, S.R. Elliott, V.E. Guiseppe, J.F. Wilkerson, S.I. Konovalov, M.A. Howe, A.L. Reine, R. T. Kouzes, M. Busch, M.F. Kidd, C.D. Christofferson, B.X. Zhu, P.-H. Chu, K. Vetter, H. Ejiri, G.K. Giovanetti, M. Shirchenko, A.W.P. Poon, J. Rager, E.W. Hoppe, T. Gilliss, J. Myslik, B.R. White

Bibliographic record

VenueUNC Libraries · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMAJORANAComputer scienceEnvironmental sciencePhysicsParticle physicsFermion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Majorana Collaboration is using an array of high-purity Ge detectors to search for neutrinoless double-beta decay in 76Ge. Searches for neutrinoless double-beta decay are understood to be the only viable experimental method for testing the Majorana nature of the neutrino. Observation of this decay would imply violation of lepton number, that neutrinos are Majorana in nature, and provide information on the neutrino mass. The Majorana Demonstrator comprises 44.1 kg of p-type point-contact Ge detectors (29.7 kg enriched in 76Ge) surrounded by a low-background shield system. The experiment achieved a high efficiency of converting raw Ge material to detectors and an unprecedented detector energy resolution of 2.5 keV FWHM at Qββ. The Majorana collaboration began taking physics data in 2016. This paper summarizes key construction aspects of the Demonstrator and shows preliminary results from initial data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNC LibrariesSame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207