MaskSleepNet: A Cross-Modality Adaptation Neural Network for Heterogeneous Signals Processing in Sleep Staging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning methods have become an important tool for automatic sleep staging in recent years. However, most of the existing deep learning-based approaches are sharply constrained by the input modalities, where any insertion, substitution, and deletion of input modalities would directly lead to the unusable of the model or a deterioration in the performance. To solve the modality heterogeneity problems, a novel network architecture named MaskSleepNet is proposed. It consists of a masking module, a multi-scale convolutional neural network (MSCNN), a squeezing and excitation (SE) block, and a multi-headed attention (MHA) module. The masking module consists of a modality adaptation paradigm that can cooperate with modality discrepancy. The MSCNN extracts features from multiple scales and specially designs the size of the feature concatenation layer to prevent invalid or redundant features from zero-setting channels. The SE block further optimizes the weights of the features to optimize the network learning efficiency. The MHA module outputs the prediction results by learning the temporal information between the sleeping features. The performance of the proposed model was validated on two publicly available datasets, Sleep-EDF Expanded (Sleep-EDFX) and Montreal Archive of Sleep Studies (MASS), and a clinical dataset, Huashan Hospital Fudan University (HSFU). The proposed MaskSleepNet can achieve favorable performance with input modality discrepancy, e.g. for single-channel EEG signal, it can reach 83.8%, 83.4%, 80.5%, for two-channel EEG+EOG signals it can reach 85.0%, 84.9%, 81.9% and for three-channel EEG+EOG+EMG signals, it can reach 85.7%, 87.5%, 81.1% on Sleep-EDFX, MASS, and HSFU, respectively. In contrast the accuracy of the state-of-the-art approach which fluctuated widely between 69.0% and 89.4%. The experimental results exhibit that the proposed model can maintain superior performance and robustness in handling input modality discrepancy issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".