Multi-Client Secure and Efficient DPF-Based Keyword Search for Cloud Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a multi-client secure and efficient keyword search scheme for cloud storage, which is built upon distributed point function (DPF). Specifically, outsourced keyword indexes are encoded by using garbled bloom filter and cuckoo filter, instead of bloom filter adopted by most of the state-of-the-art DPF-based schemes. In this way, clients can apply cuckoo hashing into DPF and utilize a segmentation method to interact with cloud servers for keyword search, and servers can obliviously aggregate DPF evaluation results to perform the search. Accordingly, the computational complexity at server side can be significantly reduced. Furthermore, the proposed scheme preserves constant downlink overheads, which is more communication-efficient for multi-keyword conjunctive search. To achieve privacy preservation and access control for multiple clients, we propose a double encryption method to encrypt outsourced indexes and correspondingly put forward an authorization algorithm from set-constrained pseudorandom functions by which fine-grained search-authorized keys can be generated, and collusion attacks among clients are addressed by integrating Wegman-Carter message authentication codes and cover-free systems. Since our scheme is designed under both semi-honest and malicious models (i.e., malicious servers may return incorrect query results), we use a simulation-based proof to formally demonstrate its security properties. Finally, we develop a proof-of-concept prototype and perform extensive experiments to show our scheme's practicality and efficiency in terms of computation, communication, and storage overheads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".