« Génie » de Nouvelle-France : entre altérité et différence dans les relations de voyage jésuites de Paul Lejeune1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paul Lejeune est l’auteur de la majorité des relations jésuites de Nouvelle-France des années 1630. La publication de ces missives annuelles s’institutionnalise durant cette décennie et elles circulent progressivement hors de la Compagnie de Jésus. Les représentations du peuple innu et de leur altérité spirituelle évoluent alors, d’une description démoniaque à des superstitions remplaçables par la doctrine chrétienne. Pour ce faire, le missionnaire s’appuie principalement sur le sens antique de la notion de génie, mais il nuance rapidement par la suite ce rapprochement historique, puis l’usage même de termes chrétiens. Ainsi, Paul Lejeune laisse transparaître, peut-être malgré lui, la permanence d’une altérité spirituelle et métaphysique, impossible à penser à l’intérieur de l’imaginaire européen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".