Bien-être en classe de musique d’élèves du primaire inscrits à un programme Arts-études
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cet article est de décrire le bien-être psychologique de 164 élèves de la 3e à la 6e année du primaire inscrits à un programme Arts-études en musique au Québec. Les résultats soulignent des différences significatives selon le genre et le niveau scolaire des participants. Entre autres, les filles rapportent plus de plaisir et de motivation que les garçons. Les élèves de 6e année indiquent éprouver moins de plaisir, de satisfaction, de motivation, avoir une moins haute estime de soi et une perception plus négative du climat d’appartenance que ceux de 3e et de 4e année. L’origine de la participation au programme (suggestion des parents ou demande de l’enfant) serait un modérateur de ces effets. Il semble ainsi qu’une attention particulière doit être portée quant au bien-être en classe des garçons de 6e année dont les parents suggèrent la participation à un tel programme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".