Segmentation of Arm Ultrasound Images in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Database and Deep Learning Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer treatment often causes the removal of or damage to lymph nodes of the patient's lymphatic drainage system. This side effect is the origin of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL), referring to a noticeable increase in excess arm volume. Ultrasound imaging is a preferred modality for the diagnosis and progression monitoring of BCRL because of its low cost, safety, and portability. As the affected and unaffected arms look similar in B-mode ultrasound images, the thickness of the skin, subcutaneous fat, and muscle have been shown to be important biomarkers for this task. The segmentation masks are also helpful in monitoring the longitudinal changes in morphology and mechanical properties of tissue layers. METHODS: For the first time, a publicly available ultrasound dataset containing the Radio-Frequency (RF) data of 39 subjects and manual segmentation masks by two experts, are provided. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility studies performed on the segmentation maps show a high Dice Score Coefficient (DSC) of 0.94±0.08 and 0.92±0.06, respectively. Gated Shape Convolutional Neural Network (GSCNN) is modified for precise automatic segmentation of tissue layers, and its generalization performance is improved by the CutMix augmentation strategy. RESULTS: We got an average DSC of 0.87±0.11 on the test set, which confirms the high performance of the method. CONCLUSION: Automatic segmentation can pave the way for convenient and accessible staging of BCRL, and our dataset can facilitate development and validation of those methods. SIGNIFICANCE: Timely diagnosis and treatment of BCRL have crucial importance in preventing irreversible damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".