Spatiotemporal Changes in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Incidence in a Low-Epidemic Area of China in 2005-2020: Retrospective Spatiotemporal Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In China, tuberculosis (TB) is still a major public health problem, and the incidence of TB has significant spatial heterogeneity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the temporal trends and spatial patterns of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in a low-epidemic area of eastern China, Wuxi city, from 2005 to 2020. METHODS: The data of PTB cases from 2005 to 2020 were obtained from the Tuberculosis Information Management System. The joinpoint regression model was used to identify the changes in the secular temporal trend. Kernel density analysis and hot spot analysis were used to explore the spatial distribution characteristics and clusters of the PTB incidence rate. RESULTS: A total of 37,592 cases were registered during 2005-2020, with an average annual incidence rate of 34.6 per 100,000 population. The population older than 60 years had the highest incidence rate of 59.0 per 100,000 population. In the study period, the incidence rate decreased from 50.4 to 23.9 per 100,000 population, with an average annual percent change of -4.9% (95% CI -6.8% to -2.9%). The incidence rate of pathogen-positive patients increased during 2017-2020, with an annual percent change of 13.4% (95% CI 4.3%-23.2%). The TB cases were mainly concentrated in the city center, and the incidence of hot spots areas gradually changed from rural areas to urban areas during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The PTB incidence rate in Wuxi city has been declining rapidly with the effective implementation of strategies and projects. The populated urban centers will become key areas of TB prevention and control, especially in the older population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".