Numerical Analysis of Battery Thermal Management System Using Passive Cooling Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Nowadays electric vehicle is replacing internal combustion engines in the transport sector. The growth of electric vehicles is increasing rapidly to reduce the impact of global warming and climate change. The battery limits the use of electric vehicles as an exact alternative to traditional IC engine vehicles. Specifically, the operating temperature, charge/discharge rates, and internal heat generation of the battery the performance of electric vehicles, like the driving range, charge storage capacity, the cycle life of the battery, and thermal runaway occurring at high temperatures. To overcome these problems, the battery thermal management system (BTMS) controls the temperature of the battery and maintains the optimal temperature to operate the battery efficiently and safely. In the heights of the above facts, the numerical analysis of 18650 Li-ion battery thermal management systems by passive cooling technology using Phase Change Material (PCM). The recent developments in battery thermal management systems, in particular, battery module analysis with and without PCM at different C rates, with and without fin are discussed at length.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Numerical Analysis using ANSYS FLUENT is carried out to determine the effect of the use of PCM on heat transfer in the battery module. Temperature distribution along the battery in the region of PCM with and without the use of fins of various geometries and their configuration are predicted. Among all the geometries studied, the use of “I” section fin had a profound beneficial effect on heat transfer leading to better performance of the battery.</div></div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".