MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323537839 · doi:10.1101/2023.03.05.531203

The influence of early life exposures on the infant gut virome

2023· preprint· en· W4323537839 on OpenAlexafffund
Yichang Zhang, Josué L. Castro‐Mejía, Ling Deng, Shiraz A. Shah, Jonathan Thorsen, Cristina Leal Rodríguez, Leon Eyrich Jessen, Moïra B. Dion, Bo Chawes, Klaus Bønnelykke, Søren J. Sørensen, Hans Bisgaard, Sylvain Moineau, Marie‐Agnès Petit, Jakob Stokholm, Dennis Sandris Nielsen

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersDet Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Københavns UniversitetCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueNovo Nordisk FondenDanish Agency for Science and Higher EducationFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western AustraliaCopenhagen Graduate School for Nanoscience and NanotechnologyNovo Nordisk
KeywordsHuman viromeBiologyMicrobiomeMetagenomicsBacteriophageGut floraHost (biology)FecesVirusMicrobiologyZoologyGeneticsGeneImmunologyEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Large cohort studies have contributed significantly to our understanding of the factors that influence the development of the bacterial component of the gut microbiome (GM) during the first years of life. However, the factors that shape the colonization by other important GM members such as the viral fraction remain more elusive. Most gut viruses are bacteriophages (phages), i.e., viruses attacking bacteria in a host specific manner, and to a lesser extent, but also widely present, eukaryotic viruses, including viruses attacking human cells. Here, we utilize the deeply phenotyped COPSAC2010 birth cohort consisting of 700 infants to investigate how social, pre-, peri- and postnatal factors may influence the gut virome composition at one year of age, where fecal virome data was available from 645 infants. Among the different exposures studied, having older siblings and living in an urban vs. rural area had the strongest impact on gut virome composition. Differential abundance analysis from a total of 16,118 viral operational taxonomic units (vOTUs) (mainly phages, but also 6.1% eukaryotic viruses) identified 2,105 vOTUs varying with environmental exposures, of which 5.9% were eukaryotic viruses and the rest was phages. Bacterial hosts for these phages were mainly predicted to be within the Bacteroidaceae, Prevotellaceae , and Ruminococcaceae families, as determined by CRISPR spacer matches. Spearman correlation coefficients indicated strong co-abundance trends of vOTUs and their targeted bacterial host, which underlined the predicted phage-host connections. Further, our findings show that some gut viruses encode important metabolic functions and how the abundance of genes encoding these functions is influenced by environmental exposures. Genes that were significantly associated with early life exposures were found in a total of 42 vOTUs. 18 of these vOTUs had their life styles predicted, with 17 of them having a temperate lifestyle. These 42 vOTUs carried genes coding for enzymes involved in alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, glycolysis-gluconeogenesis, as well as fatty acid biosynthesis. The latter implies that these phages could be involved in the utilization and degradation of major dietary components and affect infant health by influencing the metabolic capacity of their bacterial host. Given the importance of the GM in early life for maturation of the immune system and maintenance of metabolic health, these findings provide a valuable source of information for understanding early life factors that predispose for autoimmune and metabolic disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207