MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323538425 · doi:10.1117/12.2647283

Multiaxis applications of a cryogenic range-resolved laser interferometer

2023· article· en· W4323538425 on OpenAlexaff
Adam J. Christiansen, David Naylor, Brad G. Gom

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferometryDetectorOpticsMetrologyLaserDynamic rangeAstronomical interferometerDirect-conversion receiverSpectrometerPhysicsAmplifierElectronic engineeringComputer scienceOptoelectronicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A range-resolved laser interferometer is the leading candidate for providing displacement metrology that can meet the stringent precision and low power dissipation requirements of cryogenic space astronomy missions. In prior work, a three-phase homodyne laser interferometer was developed using a simple optical and signal processing scheme that achieved the desired dynamic performance required for state-of-the-art cryogenic far-infrared spectrometers, however, the system required three detectors and amplifiers, and exhibited poor performance at low speeds due to 1/f noise associated with the detector and electronics.1,2 A frequency modulation continuous wave (FMCW) heterodyne approach was subsequently adopted to address this shortcoming by shifting the signal of interest well away from the 1/f region.1,3 This technique provides the additional advantage of enabling simultaneous multiaxis measurements all using a single laser and a single detector. This paper discusses several applications of the multiaxis FMCW design that as currently implemented can provide simultaneous measurements of up to 8 axes. The need for a precise and intrinsically low power 1-D displacement metrology system to measure the optical path difference of a cryogenic Fourier transform spectrometer was the initial driver for this research; applications in N-dimensions are currently being explored. Several applications of the technique at both high and low speeds are considered, including multiaxis precision linear positioning, the simultaneous measurement of the cryogenic coefficients of thermal expansion for multiple materials, and cryogenic accelerometry. Results from these applications will be presented and used to discuss limitations of the technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology TechniquesFrench-language works237,207