DPAGT1-CDG: Report of Two New Pediatric Patients and Brief Review of the Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Congenital glycosylation disorders are multisystem diseases with heterogeneous clinical manifestations caused by defects in the synthesis of the glycan moiety of glycoproteins or glycolipids or the binding of glycans to proteins and lipids. DPAGT1 (UDP-GlcNAc: dolichol phosphate N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphotransferase) is an initiating protein in the biosynthetic pathway of dolichol-linked oligosaccharides required for protein N-glycosylation. Pathogenic variants in DPAGT1 (UDP-GlcNAc: dolichol phosphate N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphotransferase) gene cause a rare type of congenital glycosylation disorder called DPAGT1-CDG (formerly CDG-Ij) (OMIM #608093). It is a rare autosomal recessive disease or a milder version with congenital myasthenic syndrome known as DPAGT1-CMS. A severe disease course with hypotonia, cataracts, skeletal deformities, resistant epilepsy, intellectual disability, global developmental delay, premature death has been described in most patients with DPAGT1-CDG. Patient Presentation: We describe two patients with variants in the DPAGT1 gene: an 8-month-old boy with a homozygous, missense DPAGT1:c.339T>G (p.Phe113Leu) novel variant and a 13-year-old female patient with compound heterozygous variants, DPAGT1:c.466C>T (p.Arg156Cys, R156C) and DPAGT1:c.161+5G>A. While the 8-month-old patient was diagnosed with congenital cataract at the age of 1 month, had dysmorphic findings, and epilepsy, clinical symptoms in the other patient appeared later but with more prominent muscle weakness, behavioral disorder, dysmorphic findings, and no epilepsy. Discussion: Cholinesterase inhibitor therapy was found to be effective in patients against muscle weakness, supporting DPAGT1 deficiency as the underlying etiology. We started pyridostigmine treatment in our patient with more pronounced muscle weakness, and we saw its benefit. We aimed to present our patients diagnosed with DPAGT1-CDG due to different variants in the same gene and different clinical presentations, treatment and to compare them with other patients in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".