MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323542613 · doi:10.1117/12.2653006

Epidermal-dermal segmentation and polarization feature analysis using advanced Jones matrix optical coherence tomography

2023· article· en· W4323542613 on OpenAlexaff
Sina Maloufi, Xin Zhou, Daniel C. Louie, Mitra Mirsalehi, Tim K. Lee, Shuo Tang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyDermisStratum corneumMaterials scienceBirefringenceBiomedical engineeringOpticsAnatomyPathologyMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jones matrix optical coherence tomography (JM-OCT) is a form of polarization-sensitive OCT (PS-OCT) that allows for the simultaneous and high-quality in vivo capture of multiple polarization-based imaging contrasts. Our system allows for the capture of high-sensitivity structural OCT, degree of polarization uniformity (DOPU), and birefringence images. Segmenting the epidermal-dermal junction is a topic of high interest in OCT and dermatology. While others have explored this with traditional OCT, no other groups have used this type of segmentation with JM-OCT. We believe that combining a reliable segmentation procedure with the robust and localized characterization provided by JM-OCT can help fully utilize the strengths of both techniques and allow for a better characterization of the skin layers. Here, we utilize JM-OCT to assess the skin properties of healthy volunteers. Using high-sensitivity OCT, we quantified the epidermal thickness of various locations in vivo and were able to segment the epidermis, dermis, and stratum corneum in thick skin. Polarization imaging is sensitive to specific structures in the skin, such as collagen and melanin, and we were able to quantify the depolarization, and birefringence caused by these structures in different skin layers. In thick skin, localized polarization results showed an average DOPU of 0.89 in the dermis compared to an average of 0.79 in the stratum corneum. However, in both thick and thin skin, DOPU was lower overall in the epidermis compared to the dermis, indicating that most observed depolarization occurs due to the structure of the stratum corneum. Birefringence was found to be higher in the dermis than the epidermis in both cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207