Switched Reluctance Motor Design for a Light Sport Aircraft Application
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the design of a switched reluctance motor (SRM) for a direct-drive propulsion application for a light sport aircraft. The SRM is designed to replace a 70 kW permanent magnet synchronous motor used in aerospace application with similar dimensional constraints. As a means of achieving high torque density and efficiency, a multi-objective design framework is used to optimize the geometry parameters of the motor. In order to further reduce the weight, rotor cutouts are implemented. The conduction angles for the asymmetric bridge converter are selected by employing a multi-objective genetic algorithm to map the torque speed characteristics of the motor. The core losses are evaluated with the modified Bertotti method to calculate the motor efficiency and determine the steady-state and transient thermal performance at the base speed. The designed coil winding is wound on a spindle winder, and the coil fitting, fill factor, and the coil retention are validated experimentally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it