Dynamic Resilience Quantification of Hydropower Infrastructure in Multihazard Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ensuring the continued functionality of hydropower infrastructure is of the greatest importance, considering the devastating socioeconomic and environmental impacts of dam operation failures. Among the different approaches currently adopted in hydropower dam operational safety, those that are resilience-based are at the leading edge because they focus on assessing the dynamic system performance pre-, during-, and post-hazard exposures. However, the main challenge for such assessment pertains to the complexity associated with the dynamic operation simulation of hydropower dam systems that consist of several components with nonlinear interdependencies. Moreover, the infrastructure’s exposure to a multihazard environment, which may impact one or more hydropower critical system components, poses further challenges to understanding possible subsequent dam operation failure scenarios. This study develops a resilience-centric system dynamics simulation model that provides a holistic representation of hydropower dam system components to estimate the system’s dynamic resilience in multihazard environments. The study also discusses a combinatorial procedure to generate multihazard scenarios, where a primary hazard can trigger one or more subsequent hazards. Finally, an actual hydropower dam is employed to demonstrate the developed model utility in assessing the resilience of complex infrastructure under a wide range of multihazard scenarios. The proposed model provides valuable decision support tools for infrastructure systemic risk mitigation in multihazard environments—facilitating the development of effective resilience planning strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".