MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323645977 · doi:10.1109/fnwf55208.2022.00035

Angle of Arrival Estimation for Terahertz-enabled Space Information Networks

2022· article· en· W4323645977 on OpenAlexaff
Hasan Nayır, Güneş Karabulut Kurt, Ali Görçin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAngle of arrivalBeamformingDirection of arrivalTransmission (telecommunications)Bandwidth (computing)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsAlgorithmAntenna (radio)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Space information networks (SINs) empowered by Terahertz (THz) frequencies are expected to play a vital role in next-generation wireless space networks due to the unique transmission characteristics and coverage extension capabilities of SINs, owing to their high altitudes. Also, utilizing THz frequencies allows the usage of more bandwidth. However, communications in this frequency range come at the cost of extreme path loss, especially for low-orbit implementation of SINs. High gain narrow beamforming utilizing a large number of antennas can be considered to overcome substantial losses at these frequencies. Consequently, highly accurate and efficient angle of arrival (AoA) estimation algorithms are required to achieve successful beamforming and eventually to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in SINs. To this end, we propose the utilization of a two-stage gold-MUSIC algorithm over an array of subarray (AoSA) structure for AoA estimation with lower power consumption and less hardware complexity compared to the contemporary arrays due to the reduced RF-chain in AoSA. Furthermore, we introduce an analysis of AoA estimation performance in terms of residual Doppler spread, which is a realistic metric for SINs since Doppler cannot be accurately estimated in the case of instantaneous rapid motional changes of satellites especially at high frequencies. Results show that the proposed two-staged gold-MUSIC method for AoSA provides accurate AoA estimation while being computationally efficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207