MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323646077 · doi:10.1109/fnwf55208.2022.00030

An Architecture for Autonomic Networks

2022· article· en· W4323646077 on OpenAlex
Petar Djukic

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsCiena (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer architectureSoftware architectureMultilayered architectureArchitectureSoftware architecture descriptionArchitectural patternReference architectureDatabase-centric architectureResource-oriented architectureSoftwareNetwork architectureApplications architectureSpace-based architectureSoftware engineeringDistributed computingSoftware designProgramming languageComputer networkSoftware development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We elucidate our approach to top-down design of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) for AI-enabled autonomic network slices. We start with the notion that an API design follows from the underlying software and hardware network architecture and the function and role of each architectural block. We then proceed to describe an adaptive and fully autonomic software architecture for hybrid (software and hardware) network slices, which has recently been a topic of interest for 6G networks. The architecture uses several software design and architectural patterns, which show how the architectural blocks behave and interact with each other. The knowledge of behaviour leads to required APIs. The APIs are further specified in the pattern definitions. We provide two examples of how the architecture is used to achieve network intent with self-adapting network slices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it