MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323652738 · doi:10.1186/s12938-023-01075-1

ECG signal feature extraction trends in methods and applications

2023· review· en· W4323652738 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioMedical Engineering OnLine · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceFeature extractionArtificial intelligenceDimensionality reductionSignal processingSIGNAL (programming language)Domain (mathematical analysis)Feature (linguistics)Data miningPattern recognition (psychology)Focus (optics)Machine learningFrequency domainCurse of dimensionalityTime domainDigital signal processingComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signal analysis is a domain which is an amalgamation of different processes coming together to form robust pipelines for the automation of data analysis. When applied to the medical world, physiological signals are used. It is becoming increasingly common in today's day and age to be working with very large datasets, on the scale of having thousands of features. This is largely due to the fact that the acquisition of biomedical signals can be taken over multi-hour timeframes, which is another challenge to solve in and of itself. This paper will focus on the electrocardiogram (ECG) signal specifically, and common feature extraction techniques used for digital health and artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Feature extraction is a vital step of biomedical signal analysis. The basic goal of feature extraction is for signal dimensionality reduction and data compaction. In simple terms, this would allow one to represent data with a smaller subset of features; these features could then later be leveraged to be used more efficiently for machine learning and deep learning models for applications, such as classification, detection, and automated applications. In addition, the redundant data in the overall dataset is filtered out as the data is reduced during feature extraction. In this review, we cover ECG signal processing and feature extraction in the time domain, frequency domain, time-frequency domain, decomposition, and sparse domain. We also provide pseudocode for the methods discussed so that they can be replicated by practitioners and researchers in their specific areas of biomedical work. Furthermore, we discuss deep features, and machine learning integration, to complete the overall pipeline design for signal analysis. Finally, we discuss future work that can be innovated upon in the feature extraction domain for ECG signal analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it