Dynamic Surrogate Model for Oil Production Rates Prediction in SAGD Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper we propose a novel framework for the identification of a dynamic surrogate model (DSM) that can offer a fast and effective prediction of time-varying outputs (e.g., oil rates) of a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage process. In the framework, the prediction at any given time consists of the addition of two components: a base model plus a correction term. The former is represented by a conventional one-step forecast nonlinear model(s) used recursively to make n-steps ahead forecast. The latter is modeled error term, rationalized under the assumption that the forecast error given by the base model is correlated with time due to the recursive strategy used. Since at every time step the input to the one-step forecast model is the prediction made by the same model in the previous time step, so an error accumulation is expected as the prediction time increases. This is analogous to the well-known geostatistical Kriging method, in which the basic assumption is that prediction errors are not constant, rather they are correlated with distance, and as a result, they can be modeled separately using covariance models. The identification of the base and correction model follows the typical surrogate model framework, i.e., design of experiments, evaluation of the samples, and construction of the models. In the context of DSM, the design of experiments represents the random selection of a set of steam injection policies in the preestablished production horizon. For each of these samples, a corresponding oil production rate time series is obtained using a reservoir simulation model; this model was built using publicly available data from Norther Alberta SAGD implementations. Afterwards, the base model and correction term are identified using Long-Short Term Memory neural networks. Results show that DSM significantly outperforms the conventional one-step forecast nonlinear models used recursively. In particular DSM offers, a significant increase of median R2 value of over 0.88 and a reduction of the median and standard deviation of Mean Absolute Percentage Error of over 67.0% and 80.1%, respectively. These results suggest that DSM is able to offer effective (low error and high R2) and efficient (relatively low number of samples) to identifying computationally inexpensive surrogate models for the prediction of time-varying outputs. Furthermore, the framework holds promise to be useful in SAGD optimization efforts, such as, finding the optimal steam injection policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".