MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323655888 · doi:10.1101/2023.03.08.531718

COVID-19 as a continuous-time stochastic process

2023· preprint· en· W4323655888 on OpenAlexaff
Irfan Lone, Pir Muzaffar Jan

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Quantum Research Center
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Extinction (optical mineralogy)OutbreakPopulationEcological successionStochastic processMathematicsApplied mathematicsStochastic modellingProcess (computing)Mathematical economicsEconometricsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Computer scienceDiseaseStatisticsMedicineDemographyVirologySociologyPhysicsBiologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article a mathematical treatment of Covid-19 as a stochastic process is discussed. The chance of extinction and the consequences of introducing new Covid-19 infectives into the population are evaluated by using certain approximate arguments. It is shown, in general terms, that the stochastic formulation of a recurrent epidemic like Covid-19 leads to the prediction of a permanent succession of undamped outbreaks of disease. It is also shown that one is able to derive certain useful conclusions about Covid-19 without consideration of immune individuals in a population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies→French-language works237,207→