MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323657713 · doi:10.2118/212781-ms

Synergistic Hydrate Inhibition by Bovine Serum Albumin With Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitors

2023· article· en· W4323657713 on OpenAlexaff
Ankur Singh, Ajay Suri, Avadhoot Date

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrateBovine serum albuminNucleationChemistryClathrate hydrateBiocompatibilityBiodegradationChemical engineeringChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Using kinetic hydrate inhibitors (KHIs) can be technically and economically an ideal solution to achieving deep-sea hydrate risk management, but biodegradability requirements in many offshore locations, such as the North Sea, can restrict their usage. The problem could be addressed by developing so-called "green hydrate inhibitors." Many natural chemicals have been tested to achieve this goal. However, their performance has not been found to be at par with the non-biodegradable high-performing commercial KHIs. It has been shown by some studies that although natural chemicals cannot perform very well alone, they perform quite well when used as synergists with KHIs, possibly due to their large molecular structures with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic functional groups leading to increased steric hindrance to hydrate formation and their higher molecular viscosity possibly causing a reduction in the gas and water mass transfer rate to the hydrate nucleation sites. Thus, in this study, a protein prevalent in the circulatory system of bovine species called bovine serum albumin (BSA), was tested as a synergist with four KHIs used in academia for research and industry (PVP, PVCap, CKHI-1, and CKHI-2). Due to BSA's biodegradability, biocompatibility and nontoxicity, it is widely employed in the medical sector as a drug delivery agent. Standard constant cooling rate hydrate formation experiments at 1°C/h are performed to measure the induction time (delay in hydrate nucleation) and average hydrate growth rate within 1 hour of hydrate nucleation to evaluate the hydrate-inhibiting performance of various blends made of BSA and the four KHIs. The Induction time (IT) and the average hydrate growth rate (AHGR) delivered by each of the 0.5 wt % of the individual four KHIs are compared with the IT, and AHGR obtained from the blend of 0.25 wt % respective KHI mixed with 0.25 wt % BSA. It was found that the blends made from PVP, PVCap and CKHI-2 provided higher ITs (up to 66% for CKHI-2) and lower AHGRs (down to -60% for CKHI-2) compared to the ITs, and AHGRs obtained from the individual commercial KHIs at the same total dosage of 0.5 wt%. The blend CKHI-1 and BSA gave almost the same IT and AHGR as obtained from CKHI-1 alone. Along with high performance, the blended solutions also provide higher biodegradability as compared to commercial KHIs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→